Thursday, November 6, 2014

The Thanksgiving Day Massacre



This time of year experts are full of advice to help Americans cope with holiday stress.  I think our own efforts to meet unreasonable expectations cause this annual misery.  There are parties we must host and attend. Holiday gifts are real budget busters.  Feasting destroys waistlines.  Excessive drinking damages relationships as it attacks the liver.  But the worst part is having to hang out with people we don’t like.  Most of the year you can avoid that smelly relative who doesn’t believe in baths, but you have to sit beside him at Thanksgiving dinner.
A group of doctors from a world-famous clinic recommends:
 “Try to accept family members and friends as they are, even if they don't live up to all of your expectations.”  Like all advice, this bit should be taken with a grain of salt and tempered with a massive dose of common sense. 
In Florida on Thanksgiving Day, 2009, Paul Merhige showed up at his family Thanksgiving dinner.  Paul’s uncle, the host of the party, had earlier told Paul’s parents that Paul was not invited.  Paul had a history of violence caused by mental illness. Shortly after his arrival at the dinner, Paul pulled out a gun and opened fire on his relatives.  He killed both of his sisters, his little niece, and his aunt.  He also shot his brother-in-law.  Lawyers for the survivors and the estates of the dead relatives sued Paul’s parents, claiming that Paul’s parents had told him about the party and invited him to come. Arguably this invitation subjected the family to “foreseeable danger.”
Over the years, Paul was involuntarily committed to mental health facilities on three separate instances because of his violent outbursts.  He repeatedly threatened to kill family members.  Refusing to let Paul live with them, his parents gave him a condominium, money, and a housekeeper.  Before the murders, the housekeeper had warned the parents that Paul wasn’t taking his psychotropic medications.  The Court found that “the depraved nature of Paul’s mind is unquestioned.”
The law has been reluctant to hold people liable for the criminal actions of others.  Exceptions to this rule include cases imposing liability against landlords who fail to take reasonable steps to protect tenants.  Businesses, employers, jailers, hospitals and schools may be liable when their negligence results in harm to customers, employees, prisoners, patients, and students.  In those cases, the courts have found a “special relationship” between the defendants and the injured parties.  This relationship imposes a duty of reasonable care.
In February, a Florida court ruled that there was no special relationship between Paul’s parents and their relatives.  They had no duty to refrain from action that would predictably result in the deaths of their daughters and their helpless six year old granddaughter.  It further found that imposing such a duty would violate public policy.  It said that “[f]amily members with psychological or behavioral problems are a common occurrence” and that “families should be encouraged to include a troubled family member in the family circle.”  It did not want to “discourage families from providing a haven to troubled relatives.” (Note that Paul has graduated from “depraved” to “troubled.”  Also note that while the Court envisions family gatherings as a “haven,” the Mehrige party was more like a slaughterhouse.)
The case evokes many reactions.  Gun control advocates argue that it is yet another example of the carnage caused by our nation’s refusal to enact gun control laws.  Their opposition claims that the case points to a need for everyone to have guns.  Had the host of the party been packing, Paul may not have attacked.  If he had attacked, his uncle could have stopped him with a bullet or two.  Imagine the happy family sitting around the dinner table with guns strapped to their hips.  It certainly gives a new meaning to the term “food fight.”  You’d better believe I’ll pass the potatoes – pronto.
An average citizen like me is in no position to resolve these debates in time for this year’s mayhem.  As I studied the case, I wondered what I would have done had I been at that Thanksgiving dinner when Paul showed up.  I’ve decided that once he appeared on the front porch, it was too late to do anything.
 Whoever invited Paul to the gathering put everyone in a no-win situation.  Calling the police, trying to leave, or ordering Paul to leave may have triggered an attack.  When crazy Paul walked in, folks did the only thing that seemed reasonable.  They tried to avoid making him angry and prayed that they’d get out alive.  Of course, it’s pretty impossible to avoid making “depraved” people angry.  They typically show up enraged – or “troubled.”
I don’t know about you, but the court’s ruling has certainly added to my holiday stress.  From now on, I’ll have to devise an escape plan in the event of the arrival of an uninvited homicidal maniac.  Perhaps it’s just easier to stay home.  While this doesn’t encourage the growth of strong family bonds, it may reduce the stress, murders, and suicides that accompany the holidays.  Perhaps we should just Skype or send a holiday email.  It would certainly be less stressful.  I’ll sign up for Skype tomorrow.
By the way, Happy Thanksgiving.